Skip to main content

Glass

Glass A review by Azzam Abdur-Rahman I probably was the wrong person to review this film. It’s not that I dislike M. Night or his filmography but I do wonder if this was the right choice. Split succeeded for being a film that had limited scope and direct focus. Glass on paper seemed to me like a brave choice but arguably a foolish one. Unbreakable has had a cult classic status for a decade. If there is anything I have learned in this lifetime, things like that create expectations which leaves artists working against the film fans have imagined in their minds. A thankless task. Glass is what happens when a director decides to not only ignore what fans want but make a film that no one exactly asked for. Instead of an interesting thriller building off of that very grounded world of the previous films, we got a strange dramatic deconstruction of the superhero film and its effect on culture. 

First let me shout out what is good about this movie. The acting is sold but Jackson is really doing work. We often forget how amazing Jackson is as a working actor because he is comfortable taking on so many roles in so many genres but lets not forget Jackson is never bad. Willis is ok. Pretty much doing his classic look. The people who deserve all the joy are Sarah Paulson and James McAvoy. McAvoy is completely slept on as an actor. I don’t know why because this guy is taking the role from Split and building off of what is already an insanely hard character to work. On the other side of that coin Sarah Paulson deserves bigger roles. This woman has been doing thankless work for years. She takes roles that are absolute wastes of time and elevates them often. Her character in this film is a joke but she does everything to give it weight. Also big shout outss to the cinematography and set design which I dug heavy but those are the only things I can speak highly of! The writing/plot is absolutely insane! When I first started this film I thought “Holy shit he did it!” and then out of nowhere he starts an academic dissertation on mythology, the failures of society, and I start to wonder “did the success of The Visit and Split get to his head!” Because this film screams of his later works where you could tell Shyamalan lost track of his skills and let his ego get to him again. The concepts are interesting and as someone who wrote a whole article on superhero films I should like this but I think he lost the forest for the trees. The concepts and plot collapse under the weight of asking the question are superheroes good for society. Now don’t let my negative review keep you from seeing this if you are invested in this franchise. If you aren’t then don’t see this. Watch it later on some streaming service or premium channel platform. Movies like this shouldn’t be rewarded for asking questions especially if the questions they ask don’t have clear answers. Glass is a waste of time. It’s a waste of a decade. It’s a waste of hype but most importantly it was a waste of money.

0/5



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)

A retrospective by Brooks Rich Let's kick off the spooky season with a bona fide classic. I love the horror genre, but not much really scares or creeps me out. Most horror films I just watch and enjoy. However, 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' is one of those that really gets under my skin, and not just because the Sawyer family are eating people. The way Tobe Hooper shoots the film gives it an almost documentary feel. If you have never seen 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre,' you should probably fix that immediately. Do I need to explain what it's about? A group of '70s kids is driving across Texas in a van and runs afoul of the Sawyer family, including the man himself, Leatherface. It's a classic of the horror genre and one of the pioneers of the '70s and '80s horror boom. The film has a reputation for being sickeningly bloody and violent, but that is not true. It's essentially a bloodless film, which makes it even more horrifying. Most of the violence...

Forgotten Film Friday: Absolute Power

Clint Eastwood stars as Luther Whitney, a jewel thief who works in the Washington DC area. One night while he is stealing from a mansion he is forced to hide in a secret compartment with a two way mirror. From there he observes a sexual rezendevous with the wife of a powerful man and the President of the United States Alan Richmond (Gene Hackman) Suddenly the president gets aggressive and while defending herself the woman is shot to death by two Secret Service agents. Luther manages to get away with a letter opener the woman stabbed the president with. At first Luther plans to flee the country. But when he is disgusted by a statement the president makes, Luther decides to expose the crime. I miss these kind of films. The nineties was a great time for thrillers exactly like this. They are not the flashiest films but they are also not obsessed with big action scenes. It's all plot and character with them. Sure this plot might be a little out there but Eastwood makes it work. He's...

John Candy month: Summer Rental

 A retrospective by Brooks Rich Air traffic controller Jack Chester (John Candy) is given paid time off when he nearly causes two airline disasters. He takes his family down to Florida for a vacation. Hijinks ensue because its '80s comedy and Candy ends up challenging a pompous Richard Crenna to a yacht race to close out the summer.  This is a movie that has been forgotten to time in the grand scheme of Candy's career. Even with Carl Reiner directing it does have the same name recognition as some of Candy's other works. But I think it's a solid entry in his filmography. He plays a great everyman who we have no problem rooting for. The slobs versus snobs relationship he has with Crenna works like a charm and he genuinely seems like a good father and husband. Candy was always great at playing both the everyman and the aloof goofball. Sometimes he'll even play both. His character of Jack Chester in this is a good example of that. At times Jack is the goofy comic relief...