Skip to main content

IO: A review

A film review by Brooks Rich

       Netflix is going to be a destination for some interesting films. Last year we had major directors, the Coen Brothers and Alfonzo Cuaron, release films through Netflix. Martin Scorsese will release The Irishman on the platform this year. So it's becoming a destination for significant films. But we're also getting some smaller releases too. That brings us to IO, a quiet science fiction film from director Jonathan Helpert.
       IO is about a woman living along on Earth after humans have fled to Jupiter's moon, Io, as the Earth slowly dies, it's air nearly unbreathable. Sam, played by Margaret Qually, is working to save the planet when Micah, played by the always fantastic Anthony Mackie, shows up in a hot air balloon. That's all I'll say so as not to spoil anything. Just know though that IO ultimately doesn't live up to it's premise and becomes bogged down by unnecessary dialogue scenes that don't move the plot forward.
         Mackie and Qually have chemistry together and between their conversations, a majority of the film, we piece together what happened, and where humans are now. This film would be nothing without them and the strongest part is their relationship together. The story is interesting but sadly the dialogue gets a little pretentious with it's philosophy and literary quotes and it's meditations on life. I don't mind references in a film but it has to serve the story. I don't feel IO accomplishes this. The film comes to a screeching halt a few times to have the characters discuss a quote from something. I understand they are supposed to play into the film's narrative but ultimately it doesn't work.
        The film's ending does work and makes sense. I think this will be worth a watch to fans of slow burn science fiction. This is not Star Wars or anything like this. This is a slow, deliberately paced film about survival and the human condition. That will work for some people. But for me the film couldn't get out of it's own way and bogged it's great story down with it's thesis on literature and philosophy. An interesting watch but it ultimately doesn't work as a whole.

2/5


         

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)

A retrospective by Brooks Rich Let's kick off the spooky season with a bona fide classic. I love the horror genre, but not much really scares or creeps me out. Most horror films I just watch and enjoy. However, 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' is one of those that really gets under my skin, and not just because the Sawyer family are eating people. The way Tobe Hooper shoots the film gives it an almost documentary feel. If you have never seen 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre,' you should probably fix that immediately. Do I need to explain what it's about? A group of '70s kids is driving across Texas in a van and runs afoul of the Sawyer family, including the man himself, Leatherface. It's a classic of the horror genre and one of the pioneers of the '70s and '80s horror boom. The film has a reputation for being sickeningly bloody and violent, but that is not true. It's essentially a bloodless film, which makes it even more horrifying. Most of the violence...

Forgotten Film Friday: Absolute Power

Clint Eastwood stars as Luther Whitney, a jewel thief who works in the Washington DC area. One night while he is stealing from a mansion he is forced to hide in a secret compartment with a two way mirror. From there he observes a sexual rezendevous with the wife of a powerful man and the President of the United States Alan Richmond (Gene Hackman) Suddenly the president gets aggressive and while defending herself the woman is shot to death by two Secret Service agents. Luther manages to get away with a letter opener the woman stabbed the president with. At first Luther plans to flee the country. But when he is disgusted by a statement the president makes, Luther decides to expose the crime. I miss these kind of films. The nineties was a great time for thrillers exactly like this. They are not the flashiest films but they are also not obsessed with big action scenes. It's all plot and character with them. Sure this plot might be a little out there but Eastwood makes it work. He's...

John Candy month: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles

 A retrospective by Brooks Rich I decided to extend John Candy month for a bit as I had some personal issues come up. So just wrapping up some film I wanted to cover. Works for me. Just an excuse to keep talking about a master like Candy.  Steve Martin is Neil Page, a marketing executive who is flying from New York to Chicago for Thanksgiving. While trying to hail a cab he trips over a large trunk and has his taxi stolen by Del Griffith, the immortal John Candy, who ends up being one of Neil's seat mates on the plane. Bad weather in Chicago strands them in Wichita. Determined to make up for ruining Neil's travel plans, Del swears to get Neil home to Chicago in time for Thanksgiving. Hilarity ensues.  I mean come on. Who doesn't love Planes, Trains, and Automobiles? This is Candy's best film and I don't think that's a hot take. Sure some people might vote for Uncle Buck but not me. My vote is for this masterpiece of '80s comedy. It is also John Hughes best fi...