Skip to main content

Terry Gilliam month: Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas

A review by Azzam Abdur-Rahman

This one of those seminal films of the scumbums in your life. A drug film written by a madman and directed by one of the most lauded visual directors of a generation. Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is a film that has an audience who I am sure would fight me for what I am about to say… but I believe this is arguably one of the most overrated films ever made.
        I should love this film and when I was a fifteen year old boy who found drug films to be a blend of horror and coming of age, I was deeply fascinated by the worldview of those who lost themselves in a chemical wave. I found something to root for in the images of Fear and Loathing – as a fifteen year old boy. I thought Johnny Depp’s commitment to his performance as Hunter S. Thompson was incredible. Benicio Del Toro, giving one of his classic scenery-chewing performances that he shined in so well during the 90’s, doing what still keeps getting him work today. But this movie is an abject failure in storytelling and direction. 
        My first issue is that the characters have zero redeeming value. Not one. Duke is a sociopath who legitimately doesn’t even do his job righ t– he just does drugs and causes abject mayhem. The whole plot of the film is that he is going to Las Vegas to write about a motorcycle race. That is barely a moment in the film. It is just him freaking out. Dr. Gonzo is awful. Which leads to my next issue – you can’t understand a single word either actor says for like a third of the film. It took me multiple rewatches as a teenager to hear the line “this is bat country” because the audio mix of those scenes is hellish. That being said,  if that is a choice of Gilliam, it’s a bad one –  which is my main issue with this film.
        People rave about Gilliam’s eye. As a visual filmmaker, he just has a vision and an aesthetic that cannot be matched. That being said, this film is a disservice as it is a book written by a man who should have been told, “No!” And then that book is adapted by an artist who isn’t being told “No” at this point in his career. It is a poisoned chalice on every level. Scenes lead nowhere and instead of creating a visual or emotional through-line, Gilliam just goes ape-wild with his love of imagery. Gilliam could have created a truly marvelous film, but he doesn’t and, in my humble opinion, never had a handle on yje actors. Johnny Depp is out of control though, as I said above, his commitment is great. He is completely unaware of where the camera is. Del Toro finds no humanity in Gonzo. He plays him like a force of nature. A director interested in more than a mise-en-scene would have noticed that. 
        Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is a bad book that was turned into an unfocused, visual hellscape. If you like images on images on images… ignore what I have to say as my opinion doesn’t matter… but if you like character development in your films, well, this film isn’t for you. Duke (i.e Thompson) doesn’t change. Gonzo is still a monster from beginning to end. It’s all about a monologue from a drugged out fool who has nothing to say that ever mattered. End of the day? This is a film to love at 15 and loathe at 30.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)

A retrospective by Brooks Rich Let's kick off the spooky season with a bona fide classic. I love the horror genre, but not much really scares or creeps me out. Most horror films I just watch and enjoy. However, 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' is one of those that really gets under my skin, and not just because the Sawyer family are eating people. The way Tobe Hooper shoots the film gives it an almost documentary feel. If you have never seen 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre,' you should probably fix that immediately. Do I need to explain what it's about? A group of '70s kids is driving across Texas in a van and runs afoul of the Sawyer family, including the man himself, Leatherface. It's a classic of the horror genre and one of the pioneers of the '70s and '80s horror boom. The film has a reputation for being sickeningly bloody and violent, but that is not true. It's essentially a bloodless film, which makes it even more horrifying. Most of the violence...

Forgotten Film Friday: Absolute Power

Clint Eastwood stars as Luther Whitney, a jewel thief who works in the Washington DC area. One night while he is stealing from a mansion he is forced to hide in a secret compartment with a two way mirror. From there he observes a sexual rezendevous with the wife of a powerful man and the President of the United States Alan Richmond (Gene Hackman) Suddenly the president gets aggressive and while defending herself the woman is shot to death by two Secret Service agents. Luther manages to get away with a letter opener the woman stabbed the president with. At first Luther plans to flee the country. But when he is disgusted by a statement the president makes, Luther decides to expose the crime. I miss these kind of films. The nineties was a great time for thrillers exactly like this. They are not the flashiest films but they are also not obsessed with big action scenes. It's all plot and character with them. Sure this plot might be a little out there but Eastwood makes it work. He's...

John Candy month: Summer Rental

 A retrospective by Brooks Rich Air traffic controller Jack Chester (John Candy) is given paid time off when he nearly causes two airline disasters. He takes his family down to Florida for a vacation. Hijinks ensue because its '80s comedy and Candy ends up challenging a pompous Richard Crenna to a yacht race to close out the summer.  This is a movie that has been forgotten to time in the grand scheme of Candy's career. Even with Carl Reiner directing it does have the same name recognition as some of Candy's other works. But I think it's a solid entry in his filmography. He plays a great everyman who we have no problem rooting for. The slobs versus snobs relationship he has with Crenna works like a charm and he genuinely seems like a good father and husband. Candy was always great at playing both the everyman and the aloof goofball. Sometimes he'll even play both. His character of Jack Chester in this is a good example of that. At times Jack is the goofy comic relief...