Skip to main content

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

A review by Forrest Humphrey 

I'll admit it freely, as soon as I heard J.J. Abrams was back on as the director, I had a bad feeling about this film. I expected a plot driven by coincidence and macguffin hunting with plenty of “jingling keys in your face” nostalgia and well, that's exactly what we got, with plenty of retconning thrown in as well.
But before I really dig in, I should at least mention there are some things about the film of note. Its visually stunning, but then its Disney, they can throw as much money as needed for that to be a win. But still, I would feel remiss to not admire the cinematography, gorgeous scenery and excellent CGI work. The cast have solid chemistry, especially John Boyega and Oscar Isaac as we've seen in the past films and Adam Driver continues to be a fantastic find. 
So we've got great visuals and a solid cast who have grown into their roles, sounds good so far right? Unfortunately that's where my praise ends, because the rest of the film is a mess. As I mentioned earlier, this film is dripping with Abram's anger at Rian Johnson's multiple subversions in the previous film. Regardless if you love or hate “The Last Jedi”, this film walks damn near everything about that film back, and is still trying to push its own story forward, resulting in nearly three hours that still feels rushed and strained with no room to breath. It just never slows down to let you think about what's going on and the pacing is a train wreck because of it. You can feel it now, that this whole trilogy ended up being two directors playing tug of war with radically different ideas of what these characters, and Star Wars in general, should do. 
And while I do feel the cast are mostly solid we have to discuss the elephant in the room. With Carrie Fisher's passing, every scene with Leia feels awkward and wrong, its distractingly obvious they are using old unused scenes and recorded dialogue for her as her responses in conversation don't really fit what's being discussed. I understand they did the best they could, and frankly I blame TLJ for this, they had time to reshoot scenes and let Leia exit the franchise more gracefully but they didn't, which left ROS in an awkward spot. That aside, outside Rey, Finn, Poe and Kylo Ren, the rest of the cast is barely in it, but I wont get specific regarding those spoilers. 

So what we have here is a visually stunning car crash. If all you want is to see lightsaber fights and space battles, I can't say the film doesn't deliver and have you covered, but if you want anything beyond that, I imagine you'll be disappointed. At the risk of sounding pretentious, I was hoping a new series would do more than jingle lightsaber-shaped keys in my face. But maybe the supposed three year hiatus Disney will be taking after the mixed reception to the new trilogy and flop of “Solo” will give them the time they need to figure out something better for the future.

Rating: 2/5



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)

A retrospective by Brooks Rich Let's kick off the spooky season with a bona fide classic. I love the horror genre, but not much really scares or creeps me out. Most horror films I just watch and enjoy. However, 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' is one of those that really gets under my skin, and not just because the Sawyer family are eating people. The way Tobe Hooper shoots the film gives it an almost documentary feel. If you have never seen 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre,' you should probably fix that immediately. Do I need to explain what it's about? A group of '70s kids is driving across Texas in a van and runs afoul of the Sawyer family, including the man himself, Leatherface. It's a classic of the horror genre and one of the pioneers of the '70s and '80s horror boom. The film has a reputation for being sickeningly bloody and violent, but that is not true. It's essentially a bloodless film, which makes it even more horrifying. Most of the violence...

Forgotten Film Friday: Absolute Power

Clint Eastwood stars as Luther Whitney, a jewel thief who works in the Washington DC area. One night while he is stealing from a mansion he is forced to hide in a secret compartment with a two way mirror. From there he observes a sexual rezendevous with the wife of a powerful man and the President of the United States Alan Richmond (Gene Hackman) Suddenly the president gets aggressive and while defending herself the woman is shot to death by two Secret Service agents. Luther manages to get away with a letter opener the woman stabbed the president with. At first Luther plans to flee the country. But when he is disgusted by a statement the president makes, Luther decides to expose the crime. I miss these kind of films. The nineties was a great time for thrillers exactly like this. They are not the flashiest films but they are also not obsessed with big action scenes. It's all plot and character with them. Sure this plot might be a little out there but Eastwood makes it work. He's...

John Candy month: Planes, Trains, and Automobiles

 A retrospective by Brooks Rich I decided to extend John Candy month for a bit as I had some personal issues come up. So just wrapping up some film I wanted to cover. Works for me. Just an excuse to keep talking about a master like Candy.  Steve Martin is Neil Page, a marketing executive who is flying from New York to Chicago for Thanksgiving. While trying to hail a cab he trips over a large trunk and has his taxi stolen by Del Griffith, the immortal John Candy, who ends up being one of Neil's seat mates on the plane. Bad weather in Chicago strands them in Wichita. Determined to make up for ruining Neil's travel plans, Del swears to get Neil home to Chicago in time for Thanksgiving. Hilarity ensues.  I mean come on. Who doesn't love Planes, Trains, and Automobiles? This is Candy's best film and I don't think that's a hot take. Sure some people might vote for Uncle Buck but not me. My vote is for this masterpiece of '80s comedy. It is also John Hughes best fi...